For a few weeks in October, Travis Scott tickets were India’s hottest speculative asset. Prices doubled, tripled, and then quietly sank. Telegram groups became resale hubs; Instagram comments turned into classifieds. Fans panic-bought, panic-sold, and panic-refreshed. By the time the CIRCUS MAXIMUS tour actually hit Delhi, tickets that once symbolized exclusivity were being offered below face value.
And then, almost like none of that had ever happened, 100,000 people showed up for the two shows on Oct. 18 and 19 in New Delhi.
The CIRCUS MAXIMUS shows at Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium were, without question, enormous. Pyrotechnics lit up the sky, the crowd roared every lyric back, and Delhi — for two nights — looked and sounded like any major stop on a global tour. According to promoter and producer BookMyShow Live, both nights “sold out within hours” and marked “a defining moment for India’s live entertainment sector.” Their official statement to Rolling Stone India praised the “high-impact staging, pyrotechnics and lighting design” that mirrored the artist’s global standards, adding that the shows featured “seamless entry and exit, robust security measures and a world-class production that continues to raise the benchmark for live entertainment in the country.”
It’s hard to argue with any of that. The production was airtight, the crowd energy undeniable, and we ourselves gave the Oct. 18 show a four out of five star review. But what happened before those gates opened still deserves as much scrutiny as what unfolded on stage.
So what exactly happened with the ticketing confusion that drove so many fans confused?
In the weeks leading up to the show, Delhi’s ticket market told a different story — one of confusion, overconfidence, and an unregulated secondary economy. Fans bought in bulk, convinced scarcity would drive prices higher. Sellers flooded social media with inflated listings. Then, when the hype wore off and the Mumbai leg was announced weeks later, the entire resale market collapsed. The same tickets that had caused panic earlier were now being bundled, discounted, or simply given away. The live scene, once again, had priced itself into its own corner. That cycle seems to be repeating itself: as of recently, BookMyShow Live has released new Bronze Standing tickets for the Mumbai show priced at ₹5,500, and comment sections on the brand’s social media pages are flooded with fans attempting to resell their tickets—many at less than face value.
BookMyShow Live’s full statement expands on what it takes to mount a show of that scale. It points out that “large-format events involve a meticulous science behind capacity planning and ticket category mapping,” with every zone designed around “production design, crowd management and safety protocols.” It’s an important reminder: pulling off a Travis Scott concert in India is no small feat. But it also hints at where the disconnect lies — between how precisely these events are engineered behind the scenes and how vaguely they’re communicated to the public. The statement also noted that India’s live entertainment industry is entering “an exciting phase of maturity,” where such large-scale international productions are “reshaping audience expectations, operational frameworks and market readiness.” That maturity, however, must extend beyond the stage design to how audiences are engaged and informed — because infrastructure is only as strong as the trust it earns. And that trust, as industry voices point out, now hinges on verified resale systems that protect both fans and promoters.
In a recent conversation I had with Siddhant Shetty, Senior Talent Manager at Big Bad Wolf, he said, “The immediate problem highlighted here is of verified reselling and platforms that will hopefully champion that. Ideally, the big two in the market will lead the charge on that because they see the long-term benefit of it — but even if they don’t, there are plenty of smaller players who are actively working on fixes for this.” His observation underscored a larger truth: innovation may well come from the fringes if the dominant platforms stay comfortable with the current unregulated setup.
BookMyShow Live also explained that the Mumbai show, scheduled for Nov. 19 at the Mahalaxmi Racecourse, was “added following overwhelming demand,” part of a “planned, phased rollout” coordinated with Scott’s global team. November, they said, was “the only viable window within the artist’s touring calendar.” Logistically, that makes sense. But from a fan’s point of view, the timing felt off. When the Mumbai show was announced weeks after the Delhi sale, it undercut resale prices and left early buyers wondering whether the rush to secure tickets had been necessary. If the rollout was always meant to be phased, why not say so upfront? Transparency doesn’t just prevent confusion — it helps earn that trust. According to BMS Live, transforming a venue like Mumbai’s Mahalaxmi Racecourse into a stadium-grade experience required “meticulous planning, feasibility checks and coordination with local authorities” to match the scale seen in Delhi. The spokesperson described it as “a rare instance globally where an artist of this stature returns within the same tour cycle purely to honour fan demand.”
BookMyShow Live isn’t wrong to celebrate Delhi as a milestone. In fact, we’re celebrating with them. After all, the shows were executed with world-class precision and, by all accounts, created an unforgettable experience. But a “defining moment,” as they called it, should also define what needs fixing.
In cities like London or Los Angeles, that price might be a comfortable spend for a night out; in Mumbai or Delhi, it’s about the equivalent of a week’s salary for many working professionals. Yet promoters continue to benchmark local pricing against global standards, arguing that production costs, licensing, and logistics are equally expensive in India. That’s true — freight, stage design, and artist fees don’t magically get cheaper because the show is happening in a developing market. But the economy that supports those shows is not the same, and neither is the disposable income of the audience expected to sustain them.
The result is a strange loop that keeps repeating itself. Fans stretch their budgets to secure tickets the moment they drop, fearing they’ll miss out once prices inevitably climb. Resellers exploit that urgency, pushing rates higher until the market overheats. And when the initial rush fades — or when new shows like Mumbai’s are added — everything collapses. The very enthusiasm that fuels demand ends up destabilizing it. What should be a celebration of access turns into a cautionary tale of exhaustion, where fans feel played and promoters insist they simply met the market —and neither of them are wrong.
The irony is that India’s concert culture has never been more passionate. Audiences are willing to travel, queue, and spend for live experiences. But enthusiasm isn’t infinite. Each resale fiasco chips away at trust, and every inflated ticket adds to the fatigue. Unless affordability becomes part of the conversation — not as charity, but as sustainability — the live industry will keep mistaking attendance for health. People are showing up, yes, but many are stretching beyond what they can comfortably afford to do it. A strong live market doesn’t just count how many people fill the seats; it asks how many can afford to come back the next time.
What the Travis Scott ticketing saga made clear is that India’s live industry isn’t struggling because of a lack of demand — it’s struggling under the weight of it. The appetite is there. The money, in many cases, is there. The intent, is definitely there. What’s missing is structure. The country now has the audience, the venues, and the production muscle to host the biggest artists in the world. What it doesn’t yet have is the infrastructure to match that ambition.
That’s why the resale crash around CIRCUS MAXIMUS shouldn’t be treated as a minor pre-show hiccup, but rather as a warning shot. A healthy live market doesn’t implode weeks before the gates open. It doesn’t leave fans guessing about whether “sold out” really means sold out, or if new sections will quietly appear online later. It doesn’t rely on Telegram chats for last-minute ticket transfers or make audiences feel like they’ve entered a lottery instead of a concert. As Shetty adds, fan accountability and collective demand for transparency are what will eventually push organizers toward fairer systems. The pressure to reform can’t just come from the top — it has to come from the consumer base too.
If Delhi was proof that India can deliver a global concert, it was also proof that global ambition means nothing without local responsibility. The stage looked international; the system around it didn’t. The next phase of this industry isn’t about booking bigger artists — it’s about building smarter frameworks. Transparent ticketing, verified resale, and honest communication aren’t simply luxuries anymore, but the baseline for a credible market.
What comes next isn’t just policy — it’s partnership. Platforms like BookMyShow Live, artists’ teams, and fans will all need to shape what a fairer system looks like: verified resale channels that cut out scalpers, tiered and fair pricing that acknowledges local economies, and upfront communication about show rollouts. India’s live scene doesn’t need fewer risks, it needs fewer surprises. The goal isn’t to shrink the spectacle, but to make sure everyone who builds it, buys it, or believes in it, can keep showing up.
Editor’s note: An earlier version of this story was temporarily taken down following requests from members of the industry. We stand by our original reporting, and the issues it raised remain relevant today.
Leave a Reply